Last frontiers in the treatment of self- injury in the penitentiary institution. A new practice of psychiatry as psychotherapy

14
ABSTRACT

Self-injury is a phenomenon that is widespread in prison today. Defined as: “the deliberate and self-inflicted destruction of body tissues without suicidal intent”, it most often manifests itself with skin cuts on the abdomen, legs or arms.

Research for the treatment of self-injury suggests both the use of pharmacotherapy and some types of psychotherapy. In my short period of clinical practice, however, I have observed that often the solution is the administration of high dosages of tranquilizing drugs, which not only cause excessive sedation with a tendency to toxicophilia, but do not solve the problem.

The theme of this work is to argue that self-injury can be approached with a new method of psychotherapeutic practice based on the therapist’s ability to deal with the patient’s unconscious dynamics. This different approach is based on the idea that the cut is not just the expression of a symptom but that unconscious dynamics are the basis of its genesis.

The causes of self-injury in prisons are still unsolved problems to date. According to the WHO, there is a concomitance of factors related to the environment, inside and outside the prison, combined with the psychic weakness of the prisoner. The latter could be the real psychopathological cause of self-injury of which the previous ones amplify the effect. In fact, according to some authors in self-injury the psychic weakness is linked to anaffectivity: even if the nerurobiological apparatus works perfectly the patient becomes unable to experience sensations and emotions and insensitive to external stimuli belonging to the inter-human relationship, thus cutting becomes the only attempt to recover some sensitivity.

The authors refer this hypothesis to the idea that anaffectivity originates from an unconscious and aggressive dynamic: the annulment pulsion theorized by the psychiatrist Massimo Fagioli in his book “Death Instinct and Knowledge”. The annulment pulsion is directed against the object (human relationship), which in pathological situations, such as the lack of vitality, determines a disappearance of one’s inner self with the consequent lose of the affectivity and one’s sensitivity.

Fagioli through his human Birth Theory also describes a new idea of ​​physiologist of the mind. According to the author the mind is generated by the reaction of human biology towards light. This biological reaction determines a corresponding event at the psychic level the disappearance fantasy.  He proposes a vision of human inner image originated at birth: irrational, spontaneously affective and positively oriented to the relationship towards the other. An essential relationship for evolution of the newborn, in which he rediscovers his transformative possibility; in contrast with the idea of ​​narcissism, immutability and negativism of the newborn, the prerogative of psychoanalytic theories.

Following the new theoretical approach the illness, lack of vitality, is caused by a pathological relationship between caregivers and the newborn during his first year of life. The disease can be resolved in another non-pathological inter-human relationship in the psychotherapy of the unconscious. These pathophysiological events would occur even in the self-injured person leading to the manifestation of the pathology but the mechanisms are not totally investigated. This would make it possible to intervene in self-injury by this new psychiatric practice as psychotherapy based on three cornerstones: setting, transfert and the interpretation of dreams; moreover on the therapist’s human possibilities to “see” the other and to relate to his unconscious. .

This article describes the practical application of this psychotherapeutic approach in self-injury combined with drug therapy, if necessary, inside a penitentiary institution. I conclude: the psychotherapy was regular despite the difficulties related to the prison: a closed and rigid institution in which it is difficult to reconcile the idea of ​​treatment with that of ​​punishment. Furthermore it is emphasized that this type of approach has succeeded in eliminating the symptom and determining the progressive recovery of sensitivity. These results lead us to think of a possible extension of psychotherapy to other pathologies in public and closed institutions, where it is often difficult to arrive.

 

Bibliography

  • American Psychiatric Association, DSM-5. Manuale diagnostico e statistico dei disturbi mentali (2013), Raffaello Cortina, Milano 2014.
  • American Psychological Association, Criteria for evaluating treatment guidelines, in “American Psychologist”, 57, 12, 2002, pp. 1052-1059 (DOI: 10.1037/0003 066X.57.12.1052)
  • Anzilotti C., Riflessioni sulla Formazione dello psicoterapeuta.  in “Il sogno della farfalla”, 1, 2019, pp. 47- 64.
  • Arrigoni V., Autolesionismo: il carcere è un fattore di rischio, in “Cultura emotiva”, 9.10.2018, https://culturaemotiva.it/2018/autolesionismo-il-carcere-e-un-fattore-di-rischio/. 
  • Borges G. et al., Twelve-month prevalence of and risk factors for suicide attempts in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys, in “The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry”, 71, 2010, pp. 1617-1628.
  • Buffa P., Alcune riflessioni sulle condotte auto-aggressive poste in essere negli istituti penali italiani (2006-2007), in “Rassegna penitenziaria e criminologica”, 3, 2008, pp. 7-64.
  • Chambless D. L., Hollon S. D., Defining empirically supported therapies, in “Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology”, 66, 1, 1998, pp. 7-18.
  • Colamedici D., Masini A., Roccioletti G., La medicina della mente Storia e metodo della psicoterapia di gruppo, L’Asino d’oro editori, Roma 2011.
  • Di Agostino C., Fabi M., Sneider M., Autolesionismo. Quando la pelle è colpevole, L’Asino d’oro edizioni, Roma, 2016.
  • Fagioli M., Istinto di morte e conoscenza (1972), L’Asino d’oro edizioni, Roma, 2017.
  • Fagioli M., Bambino donna e trasformazione dell’uomo (1980), L’Asino d’oro edizioni, Roma, 2013.
  • Fagioli M., La psicoterapia come psichiatria. L’Asino d’oro edizioni, Roma, 2021.
  • Fagioli M., La psichiatria esiste? L’Asino d’oro edizioni, Roma, 2021.
  • Fagioli M., Insulinoterapia e psicoterapia di gruppo: valore psicoterapeutico del “senso della schizofrenicità” (1963), in “Il sogno della farfalla”, 1, 2010, pp. 11-21.
  • Favril L. et al., Suicidal ideation while incarcerated: prevalence and correlates in a large sample of male prisoners in Flanders, Belgium, in “International Journal of Law and Psychiatry”, 55, 2017, pp. 19-28.
  • Favril L. et al., Mental disorders and risk of suicide attempt in prisoners, in “Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology”, 55, 9, 2020 (DOI: 10.1007/s00127-020-01851-7).
  • Fazel S., Baillargeon J., The health of prisoners, in “The Lancet”, 377, 2011, pp. 956-965.
  • Fazel S. et al., Mental health of prisoners: prevalence, adverse outcomes, and interventions, in “The Lancet Psychiatry”, 3, 2016, pp. 871-881.
  • Fiori Nastro P., Fagioli L., Una sentenza storica, in “Il sogno della farfalla”, 4, 2011, pp. 5-13.
  • Garuti C., Fattori di rischio suicidario e autolesivo in un gruppo di detenuti presso il “servizio nuovi giunti” della casa circondariale di Ferrara, in “Psichiatria e psicoterapia”, 31, 4, 2012, pp. 244-267.
  • Haglund A. et al., Suicide after release from prison: a population-based cohort study from Sweden, in “The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 75, 2014, pp. 1047-1053.
  • Jeglic E., Vanderhoff H., Donovick P., The function of self-harm behavior in a forensic population, in “International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology”, 49, 2, 2005, pp. 131-142.
  • Katz L. Y., Fotti S., The role of behavioral analysis in the pharmacotherapy of emotionally dysregulated problem behaviors, in “Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology News”, 10, 6, 2005, pp.1-5.
  • Kerr P. L., Muehlenkamp J. J., Turner J. M., Non-suicidal self-injury: a review of current research for family medicine and primary care physicians, in “The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine”, 23, 2, 2010, pp. 240-259.
  • Klonsky E. D., Non-suicidal self-injury in United States adults: prevalence, sociodemographics, topo- graphy and functions, in “Psychological Medicine”, 41, 9, 2011, pp. 1981-1986.
  • Manconi L., Boraschi A., Quando hanno aperto la cella era già tardi perché… Suicidio e autolesionismo in carcere (2002-2004), in “Rassegna italiana di sociologia”, 47, 1, 2006, pp. 117-150.
  • Manconi L., Torrente G., La pena del suicidio. Comparazione tra gli atti di autolesionismo nelle carceri di Piemonte, Liguria e Campania, in “Politica del Diritto”, 43, 1, 2012, pp. 1-176.
  • Mitchell P. et al., Cognitive behavior therapy for adolescent offenders with mental health problems in custody, in “Journal of Adolescence”, 34, 3, 2011, pp. 433-443.
  • Muehlenkamp J. J., Empirically supported treatments and general therapy guidelines for non-suicidal self-injury, in “Journal of Mental Health Counseling”, 28, 2, 2006, pp. 166-185.
  • Nock M. K., Self-injury, in “Annual Review of Clinical Psychology”, 6, 2010, pp. 339-363.
  • Palmer E. J., Connelly R., Depression, hopelessness and suicide ideation among vulnerable prisoners, in “Criminal Behavior and Mental Health”, 15, 3, 2005, pp. 64-170.
  • Plener P. L., Libal G., Nixon M. K., Use of medication in the treatment of non-suicidal self-injury in youth, in Self-injury in youth: the essential guide to assessment and intervention, a cura di M. K. Nixon e N. L. Heath, Routledge, New York – London 2009, pp. 275-308.
  • Pratt D. et al., Cognitive-behavioural suicide prevention for male prisoners: a pilot randomized controlled trial, in “Psychological Medicine”, 45, 16, 2015, pp. 3441-3451.
  • Sakelliadis E. I. et al., Self-injurious behavior among Greek male prisoners: prevalence and risk factors, in “European Psychiatry”, 25, 2010, pp. 151-158.
  • Sandman C. A., Psychopharmacologic treatment of non-suicidal self-injury, in Understanding non- suicidal self-injury: origins, assessment, and treatment, a cura di M. K. Nock, American Psy- chological Association (APA), Washington D.C. 2009, pp. 291-322.
  • Smith H. P. et al., Working with prisoners who self-harm: a qualitative study on stress, denial of weak- ness, and encouraging resilience in a sample of correctional state, in “Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health”, 29, 7, 2019, pp. 17-26.
  • Smith H. P., Kaminski R. J., Self-injurious behaviors in state prisons findings from a national survey, in “Criminal Justice and Behavior”, 38, 1, 2011, pp. 26-41.
  • Tokarski Z. et al., Zachowania autoagresywne w zakładach penitencjarnych (Self-aggressive behavior in prisons), in “Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski”, 186, 31, 2011, pp. 357-359.
  • Trupin E. W. et al., Effectiveness of a dialectical behavioural therapy program for incarcerated female juvenile offenders, in “Child and Adolescent Mental Health”, 7, 3, 2002, pp. 21-127.
  • Winicov N., A systematic review of behavioral health interventions for suicidal and self-harming indi- viduals in prison and jails, in “Heliyon”, 5, 9, 2019, e02379. (DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02379.eCollection 2019 Sep.).
  • Young M. H. et al., Risk of harm: inmates who harm themselves while in prison psychiatric treatment, in “Journal of Forensic Sciences”, 51, 1, 2006, pp. 156-162.